vorheriges Dokument
nächstes Dokument

The Principle of Transparency and its Limits in the context of Competition Investigations

AbhandlungenKoen Lenaerts**Speech held by the author at the competition conference 2014 “Best practices in Competition" in Vienna, from 11th until 12th December. All opinions expressed are personal.ÖZK 2015, 123 Heft 4 v. 1.9.2015

Descriptors: Access to files; confidential information; internal documents; rights of defence.

Regulation No 1/2003, Regulation No 1049/2001

The European Commission has the power not only to find that certain companies have infringed EU competition rules but it can also impose heavy fines on such companies.11Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU] ([2003] O.J. L 1/1). These considerable powers of the Commission require strict respect for the rights of the defence. Companies under investigation must therefore be able to state their case before the Commission adopts its final decision.22ECJ, Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission, C-204/00 P , C-205/00 P , C-211/00 P , C-213/00 P , C-217/00 P and C-219/00 P , EU:C:2004:6, para. 66; ECJ, Solvay v Commission, C-110/10 P , EU:C:2011:687, para. 48. Since the Commission’s position is never plucked out of thin air but is always based on the interpretation of documents in its file, companies under investigation must be given access to the Commission’s file.33Article 27(2) of Regulation No 1/2003. ECJ, Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission, cited in n. 2, para. 68; ECJ, Knauf Gips v Commission, C-407/08 P , EU:C:2010:389, para. 22. Regulation No 1/2003 guarantees such access to all relevant documents. However, access to the Commission’s file is not absolute since it does not extend to “confidential information and internal documents of the Commission or the competition authorities of the Member States".44See Article 27(2) of Regulation No 1/2003. See also ECJ, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P , C-244/99 P , C-245/99 P , C-247/99 P , C-250/99 P to C-252/99 P and C-254/99 P , EU:C:2002:582, para. 315; ECJ, Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission, cited in n. 2, para. 68; ECJ, Solvay v Commission, cited in n. 2, para. 49.

Sie möchten den gesamten Inhalt lesen?

Melden Sie sich bei Lexis 360® an.
Anmelden

Sie haben noch keinen Zugang?
Testen Sie Lexis 360® zwei Wochen kostenlos!
Jetzt testen!

Stichworte